Skip to main content

 

Theory Review Paper: Learning Styles

What Is A Style of Learning

Learning styles discuss to an array of opposing and questioned theories whose intentions are to account for differences in individuals' learning. Many theories share the suggestion that humans can be categorized according to their 'style' of learning but diverge in how the proposed styles should be defined, regarded as and evaluated. There are plenty of theories ranging from 3, 4, 6, and 8 different styles of learning.

Learning Styles

Learning ability largely refers to the framework of thought or to what is learned and learning style makes reference to how we have learned or prefer to do so. (MacKeracher, 2004, p. 75) Many are capable of using the strategies that inspire several different styles but prefer to depend on on the approaches they know best.  In general, when one refers to the term learning style much can be added to consideration cognitive styles affective, social, and physiological styles as it regards to responses to learning. Keefe created his Learning Style Profile with remnants from Witkin’s Embedded Figures Test (1962), Edmonds Learning Style Identification Exercise – ELSIE (1976) and Dunn & Dunn’s Learning Style Inventory (1975). From the Embedded Figures Test, Keefe used the cognitive domain however Edmonds Learning Style Identification Exercise – ELSIE contributed) keefe (Fthe affective domain. Lastly, Dunn & Dunn’s Learning Style Inventory added the environmental component.

Keefe.

Breakdown of Keefe’s Learning Style Profile revealed eight cognitive or data dispensation foundations such as: spatial, analytical, sequential, memory, simultaneous processing, discrimination, and verbal-spatial.

Upon his study and research, he also came to the conclusion that space and atmosphere matters. He believed that mobility, posture, persistence, sound, afternoon study time, and lighting played the biggest roles in a student’s success. He introduced Three perceptual and Six instructional preference responses: Three perceptual responses are visual, emotive, and auditory. The Six instructional preferences are early morning time, late morning time, verbal risk, manipulative, grouping, and temperature. (Keefe, 1990.)

Others who Bult on Keefe.

Other theorists adopted is theory two in particular condensed it. Peter Honey and Alan Mumford modified Kolb's experiential learning model. First, they give new name to the stages in the learning cycle to be in concurrence with decision-making experiences: having an experience, reviewing the experience, concluding from the experience, and planning the next steps. Second, they united these stages to four learning styles named: Activist, Reflector, Theorist and Pragmatist.  These styles of learning are presumed to be learned partialities that are adjustable, also at will or through altered conditions, rather than being immobile personality characteristics. Honey and Mumford's Learning Styles Questionnaire or LSQ is an evaluation. It differs from Kolb's Learning Style Inventory because it invites administrators to complete a checklist of work-related performances without directly asking managers how they learn. After completion of the self-assessment, administrators are encouraged to hone in on the underutilized areas in order to become better. (Honey, Peter; Mumford, & Alan ,2006).

Kolb introduced a theory on experiential learning where spaces and or environment have a bearing on the way a student learns.

Process

In reviewing the chapter in the MacKeracher text about learning styles I begin to understand that there is science and research behind how we learn and retain information. The bulk of the research according to the chapter started with Keefe. Then, Kolb and Kolb added their findings later on and Honey and Mumford acknowledged Keefe but edited his findings and updated it, adding factors and renaming it. In my research I utilized the Ball State Library databases and Google Scholar to research the subject matter. I reviewed the articles, made notes on the explanations of the original theories that I found interesting. Then, I grouped them into sections of related topics that summarized the ideas.

Application
 

Your name

Talisa (Tally) Anderson

Commented On

Keefe Was a pioneer in the study of Learning Styles much of the updated research expands off of his findings.

Peter Honey and Alan Mumford modified Kolb's experiential learning model. They renamed it and “updated” went a little deeper in detail about learnings styles and humans ability and functionality in earning.

Theory (Keefe)

Where you are matter! If the learning or study environment is compromised it can affect rather or not you can or will effectively learn, space and atmosphere matters. If the area is crowded, too loud, dark, you aren’t comfortable, you are a morning person but you are studying at night; these factors matter according to him. He believed that mobility, posture, persistence, sound,

afternoon study time, and lighting played the biggest roles in a student’s success.

Application:

For a teachers and employers understanding how students and employees learn and understand data aid in overall effectiveness in scholastics or on the job.  While using the learning styles model, they can effectively match the student with their learning style allowing them more aids that assist in effectiveness.

Ex- If there was an employee that a manager was having communication issues with, there may be an issue with the employee’s understanding what is asked of them. I work in a plant and we have to simplify many of or tasks or ask them to do them in laments terms because they simply do not understand the verbiage. Others often get the idea better if we show them or help them to understand the whole process of the matter instead of just their individual part. I am the same way when it comes to school, sometimes I have to break things down to the simplest form, watch other individuals do the task

 

 

References

Keefe, J. (1990). Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 57-61.

MacKeracher, D. (2004). Making sense of adult learning (2nd ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN-10: 080203778X   ISBN-13: 978-0802037787

(n.d.). Online Teaching Degrees from the University of Kansas. https://educationonline.ku.edu/community/4-different-learning-styles-to-know

Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.bsu.edu/stable/40214287

Atkinson, T. (2018). MBTI learning styles: A practical approach. Independently Published.

Honey, Peter; Mumford, Alan (2006). Learning styles questionnaire: 80-item version. London: Maidenhead.

Higbee, J., Ginter, E., & Taylor, W. (1991). Enhancing Academic Performance: Seven Perceptual Styles of Learning. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 7(2), 5-10. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org.proxy.bsu.edu/stable/42801799 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Group Syllabus: Learning Styles

  Group 1 Syllabus: Learning Styles Cara Johnson, Linda Wash, Samuel Martin, and Tally Anderson Ball State University EDAC 635: Strategies for Teaching Adults Dr. Bo Chang March 21, 2021 Group Members Roles Commented On Cara Johnson Group Leader Completed Syllabus with Tally and Summary Table Edited Entire Document Group 3 Linda Wash Completed rationale Samuel Martin Completed Introduction and Reflection Tally Anderson Completed Syllabus with Cara Introduction This one-week course will provide guidance on how to be a better teammate and work in a team. The objectives of this course include the following in a team environment: transmitting information effectively using proper communication strategies, being able to successfully partner with team members using proper collaboration techniques, being able to delegate work among team members using specialization techniques, being able to function as a group administrator using proper leadership strategies, and pursuing high-quality work...

Learning Styles Theory Review: Cara Johnson

Theory Review: Learning Styles Cara Johnson Ball State University EDAC 635: Strategies for Teaching Adults Dr. Bo Chang February 21, 2021 Name Commented On Cara Johnson Josie Campbell  What type of learner are you? Learning style is a person’s preferences for how he or she learns information (MacKeracher, 2011). Every person has a unique preferred way of learning new information that works best for him or her. Facilitators must ensure that their lessons cater to multiple different learning styles, not just their preferred style. There are several different models that are useful for instructors, including the Felder and Silverman learning style model, Kolb’s model of learning styles, and the VARK model. Main Theoretical Points             The Felder and Silverman learning style model is a useful model for educators. The model has four dimensions: the perception di...

Final Showcase - Samuel Martin

    Group Members Roles Commented On Samuel Martin Video Reflection EDAC 635   Implementation of our syllabus Our Project   What did you learn from this course? In EDAC 635 I learned about teaching strategies and techniques for adult learners. This semester was my first time teaching a course as an instructor (EDHI 200), and this was my first class that I have taken that focuses on the learning process. My background is not in teaching, so I gained a new perspective on the learning process through taking this course.  I had never had to design a syllabus or collect teaching resources before, so this was a great first exposure to this experience.  What did you like or dislike about our online discussions, group project and this course in general? I liked the large amount of materials that was provided, the fact that this was a project based course that focused on how to  implement the material. How do you think the project was able to help you understan...